@Wulian233, for the future, we generally we let the PEP author create the PR to mark as accepted, as they might have other tidying up to do.

A

Indeed, and there's also a checklist for doing so (added automatically by selecting the correct PR template):

• SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
• Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
• Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
• Resolution link points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post
• Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
• Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

Thank you for the reminder. I have revised the PR description